- Piotr M. - 100
- Mirosław L. - 20
- Leszek P. z Zamości - 50
- Michał G. - 10
- Agnieszka S. z Łodzi - 10
- Jarosław O. z Pruszkowa - 30
- Jan R. - 20
- Mirosław G. z Głogowa - 20
- ByteEater z Bielska-Białej - 10
- Andrzej J. - 20
- Jan S. - 10
- Piotr N. - 100
Dzięki!
"The president’s proposed stimulus based on “temporary” tax cuts designed to boost “consumer spending” will not work. It is a disappointing re-run of the misguided policies of Jimmy Carter. Rebates are particularly disappointing because they resuscitate the discredited Keynesian notion that an economy benefits when the government borrows money from people in one sector of the economy and distributes it to people in another sector of the economy. Economic growth occurs when there is an increase in national income, not a redistribution of national income. That is why lower marginal tax rates on work, saving, and investment are the best short-term and long-term strategy for faster growth. But such tax rate reductions should be permanent since temporary tax cuts -- even well-designed tax rate reductions rather than rebates -- do little more than generate economic activity today at the expense of less activity in the future."
Wskrzeszanie Keynesizmu i tymczasowy charakter tax rebates nie wroza nic dobrego...
Jest tam licznik "nabijajacy" koszty.
Okazuje sie ze Irak kosztuje :
$275 million per day
$4,100 per household
Almost 4,000 U.S. soldiers killed and more than 60,000 wounded
700,000 Iraqis killed and 4 million refugee
Nagromadzilo sie tych kosztow prawie bilion dolarow (trylion po amerykansku) czyli tyle ile wynosi dlug amerykanski w stosunku do Chin.
Ale czy ludy częściej wygrywają stawiajac na urny wyborcze - czy na chromosomy?Tłumy, zgromadzenia, nawet ścisłe kolegia mylą sie nie rzadziej niz przyroda, a Opatrznośc, tak czy owak, skąpi ludziom geniuszu.